The Satoshi Overhang
Why the Bear Case is Bounded
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2026.614Keywords:
Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, blockholder, patoshi, market microstructure, reflexivity, effective supply, price impactAbstract
Renewed attention to the identity of Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator has revived an old worry: that the roughly 1.148 million BTC mined by Satoshi and never moved represent a major tail risk for Bitcoin. This paper argues that the worry is overstated. The mechanical downside of selling the position is bounded well below the feared collapse, and the outcomes most consistent with sixteen years of observed behavior are not bearish for Bitcoin’s effective supply. We analyze the position in two ways. First, we model the case of a purely financial holder. Multiple sale scenarios, checked against both a square-root-law estimate and the historical record of large sales, suggest that Bitcoin’s current market liquidity could absorb a patient multi-year sale with a cumulative price impact centered around 10 to 13 percent relative to a no-sale case. The same arithmetic also links the downside from a surprise sale to the upside from a confirmed burn: both are bounded by the same effective-supply adjustment, so the doom case and the burn-rally case cannot both be large. Second, we consider the preferences implied by the sixteen-year record. Ideological restraint, privacy, already having enough, and preserving the myth all point toward further dormancy, permanent loss of access, or a deliberate burn. A sale or an act of sabotage remains possible, but the record supports it less strongly. Under both approaches, the mechanical bear case is bounded, and the likeliest outcomes are neutral to mildly positive for Bitcoin’s effective supply. The argument does not rule out transient overshoot or leverage-driven amplification; it bounds the durable repricing the coins themselves can cause.
References
Almgren, R., Chriss, N. “Optimal Execution of Portfolio Transactions.” Journal of Risk 3.2 5–39 (2001)https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2001.041.
Ambrosia, M., Dorrell, J., Stockwell, T. “Is Active Bitcoin Supply Decreasing? An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Economics and Finance 48.4 1166–1186 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-024-09691-w.
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., Vega, C. “Micro Effects of Macro Announcements: Real-Time Price Discovery in Foreign Exchange.” American Economic Review 93.1 38–62 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455151.
Ante, L., Fiedler, I. “Market Reaction to Large Transfers on the Bitcoin Blockchain: Do Size and Motive Matter?” Finance Research Letters 39 101619 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101619.
Barclay, M. J., Holderness, C. G. “Negotiated Block Trades and Corporate Control.” Journal of Finance 46.3 861–878 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03769.x.
Barclay, M. J., Holderness, C. G. “Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics 25.2 371–395 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90088-3.
Bernard, V. L., Thomas, J. K. “Evidence That Stock Prices Do Not Fully Reflect the Implications of Current Earnings for Future Earnings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 13.4 305–340 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90008-R.
Bernard, V. L., Thomas, J. K. “Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response or Risk Premium?” Journal of Accounting Research 27 1–36 (1989) supplement. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491062.
Bethel, J. E., Liebeskind, J. P., Opler, T. “Block Share Purchases and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Finance 53.2 605–634 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.244195.
Bradbury, D. “How Dangerous is Satoshi Nakamoto?” CoinDesk (23 November 2014) https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2014/11/23/how-dangerous-is-satoshi-nakamoto.
Braun, Helene “It’s Not Germany Selling Bitcoin. It’s One of Its States and It Has No Choice.” CoinDesk (2024) (9 July 2024) https://www.coindesk.com/news-analysis/2024/07/09/its-not-germany-thats-selling-bitcoin-its-one-of-its-states-and-it-has-no-choice.
BtcDrak, Friedenbach, M., Lombrozo, E. “BIP 112: CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY.” Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (2015) https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0112.mediawiki.
Carreyrou, J., Freedman, D. “My Quest to Solve Bitcoin’s Great Mystery.” The New York Times (8 April 2026) https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/08/business/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto-identity-adam-back.html.
Donier, J., Bonart, J. “A Million Metaorder Analysis of Market Impact on the Bitcoin.” Market Microstructure and Liquidity 1.2 1550008 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382626615500082.
Farmer, J. D., Gerig, A., Lillo, F., Waelbroeck, H. “How Efficiency Shapes Market Impact.” Quantitative Finance 13.11 1743–1758 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2013.848464.
Fusaro, T., Hougan, M. “Economic and Non-Economic Trading in Bitcoin.” U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Bitwise Asset Management presentation, File SR-NYSEArca-2019-01, (March 2019) https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2019-01/srnysearca201901-5164833-183434.pdf.
Holderness, C. G. “A Survey of Blockholders and Corporate Control.” FRBNY Economic Policy Review 9.1 51–64 (2003) https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.281952.
Holderness, C. G., Sheehan, D. P. “The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations: An Exploratory Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics 20 317–346 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90049-9.
Jalan, A., Matkovskyy, R., Urquhart, A. “Demand Elasticities of Bitcoin and Ethereum.” Economics Letters 220 110877 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110877.
Karantias, K., Kiayias, A., Zindros, D. “Proof-of-Burn.” In J. Bonneau, N. Heninger (Eds.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC 2020) 523–540 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51280-4_28.
Komlo, C., Goldberg, I. “FROST: Flexible Round-Optimized Schnorr Threshold Signatures.” In O. Dunkel-man, M. Jacobson, Jr., C. O’Flynn (Eds.), Selected Areas in Cryptography (SAC 2020), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12804 34–65 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81652-0_2.
Kyle, A. S. “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica 53.6 1315–1335 (1985) https://doi.org/10.2307/1913210.
Lanza, Emily M. “Blockage Discounts and Artists’ Estates: The De Kooning Post-Mortem.” Center for Art Law (28 March 2018) https://itsartlaw.org/case-review/blockage-discounts-and-artists-estates-the-de-kooning-post-mortem.
Lerner, S. D. “Protection Over Profit: What Early Mining Patterns Suggest About Bit-coin’s Inventor.” CoinDesk (31 August 2020) https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2020/08/31/protection-over-profit-what-early-mining-patterns-suggest-about-bitcoins-inventor.
Lerner, S. D. “The Well Deserved Fortune of Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin Creator, Visionary and Genius.” Bitslog (17 April 2013) https://bitslog.com/2013/04/17/the-well-deserved-fortune-of-satoshi-nakamoto.
Macheel, T. “Latest Investigation into Bitcoin Founder Ties Identity to Blockstream CEO Adam Back.” CNBC (2026) (8 April 2026) https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/08/latest-investigation-of-bitcoin-founder-ties-identity-to-blockstream-ceo-adam-back.html.
Makarov, I., Schoar, A. “Blockchain Analysis of the Bitcoin Market.” National Bureau of Economic Research (2021) NBER Working Paper 29396 https://doi.org/10.3386/w29396.
Nakamoto, S. “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” (2008) https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
Nick, J., Ruffing, T., Seurin, Y. “MuSig2: Simple Two-Round Schnorr Multi-Signatures.” In T. Malkin, C. Peikert (Eds.), Advances in Cryptology (CRYPTO 2021), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12825 189–221 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84242-0_8.
No Author. “Bitcoin Core 30.0 Release Notes.” Bitcoin Core (October 2025) https://bitcoincore.org/en/releases/30.0/.
No Author. “Estate of David Smith v. Commissioner.” 57 T.C. 650 (1972), aff’d 510 F.2d 479 (2d Cir. 1975).
No Author. “Estate of O’Keeffe v. Commissioner.” T.C. Memo 1992-210.
No Author. “Hodled or Lost Coins (BTC on-chain metric).” Glassnode (2023) https://studio.glassnode.com/metrics?a=BTC&m=indicators.HodledLostCoins. Note: This metric reached approxi-mately 7.80 million BTC in August 2023.
No Author. “Internal Revenue Code, Section 1014, 26 U.S.C. § 1014 (Basis of Property Acquired from a Decedent).” https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2024-title26/USCODE-2024-title26-subtitleA-chap1-subchapO-partII-sec1014/summary.
No Author. “IRS Publication 551: Basis of Assets.” Internal Revenue Service (2025) https://www.irs.gov/publications/p551.
No Author. “OP_RETURN.” Bitcoin Wiki (2024) (accessed April 2026) https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN.
No Author. “Total Circulating Bitcoin.” Blockchain.com (accessed April 2026) https://www.blockchain.com/charts/total-bitcoins.
Roberts, J. J., Rapp, N. “Exclusive: Nearly 4 Million Bitcoins Lost Forever, New Study Says.” Fortune (25 November 2017) https://fortune.com/2017/11/25/lost-bitcoins.
Said, E. “Market Impact: Empirical Evidence, Theory and Practice.” arXiv (2022) (accessed 6 September 2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.07385.
Sandor, K. “Bitcoin Rebounds After Galaxy Completes Sale of $9B BTC From Satoshi-Era Whale.” CoinDesk (2025) (25 July 2025) https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/07/25/bitcoin-rebounds-after-galaxy-completes-sale-of-usd9b-btc-from-satoshi-era-whale.
Shamir, A. “How to Share a Secret.” Communications of the ACM 22.11 612–613 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1145/359168.359176.
Soros, G. “Fallibility, Reflexivity, and the Human Uncertainty Principle.” Journal of Economic Methodology 20.4 309–329 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2013.859415.
Soros, G. The Alchemy of Finance. New York: Simon and Schuster (1987).
Spence, M. “Job Market Signaling.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 87.3 355–374 (1973) https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010.
Sward, A., Vecna, I., Stonedahl, F. “Data Insertion in Bitcoin’s Blockchain.” Ledger 3 1–23 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2018.101.
Throughout this paper, “Satoshi” and “Nakamoto” mean the pseudonymous creator and the associated Patoshi mining cluster; they do not mean the listed bitcoin-treasury company Nakamoto Inc. (Nasdaq: NAKA), which shares the name but has nothing to do with the holder studied here.
Todd, P. “BIP 65: OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY.” Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (2014) https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0065.mediawiki.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Rule 10b5-1, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5-1.” (accessed 6 September 2026) https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2004-title17-vol3/pdf/CFR-2004-title17-vol3-sec240-10b5-1.pdf.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Karl T. Ulrich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
- The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
