Sentiment Protocol: A Decentralized Protocol Leveraging Crowdsourced Wisdom
The wisdom of the crowd is a valuable asset in today’s society. It is not only important in predicting elections but also plays an essential role in marketing and the financial industry. Having a trustworthy source of opinion can make forecasts more accurate and markets predictable. Until now, a fundamental problem of surveys is the lack of incentives for participants to provide accurate information. Classical solutions like small monetary rewards or the chance of winning a prize are often not very attractive for participants. More attractive solutions, such as prediction markets, face the issue of illegality and are often unavailable. In this work, we present a solution that unites the advantages from classical polling and prediction markets via a customizable incentivization framework. Apart from predicting events, this framework can also be used to govern decentralized autonomous organizations.
Berg, J. E., Nelson, F. D., Rietz, T. A. “Prediction market accuracy in the long run.” International Journal of Forecasting. 24.2 285–300 (2008).
Berg, J. E., Rietz, T. A. “Prediction markets as decision support systems.” Information systems frontiers. 5.1 79–93 (2003).
Berk, J. B., Green, R. C. “Mutual fund flows and performance in rational markets.” Journal of political economy. 112.6 1269–1295 (2004).
Buterin, V. “An Introduction to Futarchy.” Ethereum Blog (2014) (accessed 30 October 2017) https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/08/21/introduction-futarchy/.
Buterin, V. “Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform.” Ethereum (accessed 17 October 2017) http://ethereum.org/ethereum.html.
Cuende, L., Izquierdo, J. “Aragon white paper.” Aragon (2017) (accessed 17 October 2017) https://wiki.aragon.one/documentation/whitepaper/.
Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., Gilovich, T. “Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment.” Journal of personality and social psychology. 87.3 327 (2004).
Ferri, R. “Any Monkey Can Beat the Market.” Forbes (2012) (accessed 13 August 2018) https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2012/12/20/any-monkey-can-beat-the-market/.
Hanson, R. “Shall we vote on values, but bet on beliefs?” Journal of Political Philosophy. 21.2 151–178 (2013).
Hirshleifer, J. “The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity.” The American economic review. 61.4 561–574 (1971).
Koppelmann, M., George, S. “Gnosis whitepaper.” Gnosis (2017) (accessed 22 October 2017) https://gnosis.pm/assets/pdf/gnosis-whitepaper.pdf.
Lowenstein, R. “Why Buffett’s Million-Dollar Bet Against Hedge Funds Was a Slam Dunk.” Fortune (11 May 2016) (accessed 17 October 2017) http://fortune.com/2016/05/11/warren-buffett-hedge-
Nakamoto, S. “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.” (accessed 22 October 2017) https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
No Author. “Definition of Gambling.” dictionary.com (accessed 28 March 2018) http://www.dictionary.com/browse/gambling.
No Author. “Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016.” Wikipedia (accessed 17 October 2017) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2016#Polls_conducted_in_2016.
No Author. “Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016.” Wikipedia (accessed 17 October 2017) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum.
No Author. “Revenue of market research and public opinion polling.” Statista (accessed 17 October 2017) https://www.statista.com/forecasts/409757/united-states-market-research-and-public-opinion-polling-revenue-forecast-naics-54191.
Parker, J. “Analysts Remain Uncertain on Tesla Stock amid Production Woes.” Market Realist (2017) (accessed 17 October 2017) https://marketrealist.com/2017/10/analysts-remain-uncertain-on-tesla-stock-amid-production-woes/.
Peterson, J., Krug, J. “Augur: a decentralized, open-source platform for prediction markets.” arXiv preprint (2015) https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01042.
Schatsky, D., Muraskin, C. “Beyond Bitcoin: Blockchain is Coming to Disrupt Your Industry.” Deloitte (2015) (accessed 2 July 2018) https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/signals-for-strategists/trends-blockchain-bitcoin-security-transparency.html.
Wattenhofer, R. The science of the blockchain. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2016).
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
- The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.