Irrational Economic Action: Running a Bitcoin Lightning Node for Negative Profit

Authors

  • Edward Gotham Feng Chia University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2023.289

Keywords:

fin-tech, Bitcoin, Lightning Network, firm theory, node operation

Abstract

Bitcoin’s layer 2 (L2) solution is a payment channel network (PCN) that has an internal market of its own. Businesses (node operators) compete on a cost basis to maximize use of their locked liquidity by minimizing channel fees. From an economic perspective this is a standard profit maximization problem, however as described in Béres, Seres, and Benczúr (2021), profit on node operation is so low that it is economically irrational. Despite this, the number of nodes continues to grow, even as the price of Bitcoin declines. Many node businesses likely operate at a net USD loss, especially when factors such as labor and loss of access to capital are considered. This paper is an economist’s account of entering into an apparently irrational market. Due to difficulties with surveying node operators, the primary objective of the paper, uncovering the reason for financial loss making activity, was not discovered, however this paper is the first to: describe the internal L2 market for routing; provide basic business balance sheet items for a median scale node; describe the on-boarding process of node operation; and identify the need for differentiation of personal/routing/hybrid nodes.
The market for routing is near-perfect in terms of internal competition, but sub-optimally arranged. Operating losses that many node operators face appear to be rationalized as a “fiat only” loss, node operators exist within a Bitcoin-only profit paradigm. Computing the actual fiat profit margin is not possible, due to insufficient data regarding the average fiat cost of the bitcoin deposited to provide routing liquidity.

References

Amboss, “Stats,” Amboss (accessed 15 May 2023) http://amboss.space/stats.

Aysan, A. F., Demirtas, H. B., Saraç, M. “The Ascent of Bitcoin: Bibliometric Analysis of Bitcoin Research.” Journal of Risk and Fiancial Management 14 427 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14090427.

Bartolucci, S., Caccioli, F., Vivo, P. “A Percolation Model for the Emergence of the Bitcoin Lightning Network,” Sci Rep 10 4488 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61137-5.

Béres, F., Seres, I. A., Benczúr, A. A. “A Cryptoeconomic Traffic Analysis of Bitcoin’s Lightning Network,” Cryptoeconomic Systems 1.1 (2021) https://doi.org/10.21428/58320208.d4cd697e.

BitMEX Research, “The Lightning Network (Part 2) – Routing Fee Economics,” BitMEX (27 March 2019) https://blog.bitmex.com/the-lightning-network-part-2-routing-fee-economics/.

Checkmate and Glassnode, “The Week Onchain (Week 39, 2021)” Glassnode Insights (27 September 2021) https://insights.glassnode.com/the-week-on-chain-week-39-2021/.

De Silva, A., Thakur, S., Breslin, J. “Profitable Fee Controller for Payment Channel Networks,” in Prieto, J., Benítez Martínez, F.L., Ferretti, S., Arroyo Guardeño, D., Tomás Nevado-Batalla, P. (eds) Blockchain and Applications, 4th International Congress . BLOCKCHAIN 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 595 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21229-1_9.

Di Stasi, G., Avallone, S., Canonico, R., Ventr, G. “Routing Payments on the Lightning Network,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), Halifax 1161-1170 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/Cybermatics_2018.2018.00209.

Divakaruni, A. and Zimmerman, P. “The Lightning Network: Turning Bitcoin into Money,” Working Paper No. 22-19. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (2022) https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-202219.

Ersoy, O., Roos, S., Erkin, Z. “How to Profit from Payment Channels," arXiv (2019) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.08803.

Feng, J. “Bitcoin Is Dead,” (10 August 2022) https://www.bitcoinisdead.org/.

Georgiadis, E. “How Many Transactions Per Second Can Bitcoin Really Handle? Theoretically.” IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 416 (2019) https://ia.cr/2019/416.

Guasoni, P., Huberman, G., Shikhelman, C. “Lightning Network Economics: Channels,” Michael J. Brennan Irish Finance Working Paper Series Research Paper 21-7 (2023) https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3840374.

Guo, Y., Tong, J., Feng, C. “A Measurement Study of Bitcoin Lightning Network,” 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), Atlanta, GA 202-211 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/Blockchain.2019.00034.

Hong, H.-J., Chang, S.-Y., Zhou, X. “Auto-tune: An Efficient Autonomous Multi-Path Payment Routing Algorithm for Payment Channel Networks," Computer Networks 225 109659 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109659.

Jun Ren, A. H., Feng, L., Cheong, S. A., Mong Goh, R. S. “Optimal Fee Structure for Efficient Lightning Networks,” 2018 IEEE 24th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS) Singapore 980-985 (2018) http://doi.org/10.1109/PADSW.2018.8644930.

Khan, N., State, R. “Lightning Network: A Comparative Review of Transaction Fees and Data Analysis,” in Prieto, J., Das, A., Ferretti, S., Pinto, A., Corchado, J. (Eds.) Blockchain and Applications. BLOCKCHAIN 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23813-1_2.

Lin, J.-H., Marchese, E., Tessone, C. J., Squartini, T. “The Weighted Bitcoin Lightning Network,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 164 112620 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112620.

Martin, B. A., Chrysochou, P., Strong, C., Wang, D., Yao, J. “Dark Personalities and Bitcoin®: The Influence of the Dark Tetrad on Cryptocurrency Attitude and Buying Intention,” Personality and Individual Differences 188 111453 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111453.

Nakamoto, S. “Scalability and transaction rate” Bitcointalk (29 July 2010) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6269#msg6269.

No Author, “Amboss,” Amboss (2022) https://amboss.space/.

No Author, “Real-Time Lightning Network Statistics,” 1ML (2022) https://1ml.com/statistics.

Obondo, B. “Lightning Network (beta) Launched on Bitcoin Mainnet for the First Time," (2018) Available via The Internet Archive https://web.archive.org/web/20230101022704/https://theblockpro.com/cryptocurrency/bitcoin/lightning-network-beta-launched-bitcoin-mainnet-first-time/.

Openoms, “Guides for the RaspiBlitz and Linux Desktop,” GitHub (accessed 6 June 2020) https://github.com/openoms/bitcoin-tutorials.

Pedrosa, A. R., Potop-Butucaru, M., Tucci-Piergiovanni, S. “Scalable Lightning Factories for Bitcoin,” in SAC '19: Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing 302-209 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3297280.3297312.

Pickhardt, R. “Price of Anarchy from Selfish Routing Strategies on the Lightning Network,” BitMEX (26 May 2022) https://blog.bitmex.com/price-of-anarchy-from-selfish-routing-strategies/.

Pickhardt, R., Richter, S. “Optimally Reliable & Cheap Payment Flows on the Lightning Network,” arXiv (2021) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.05322.

Poon , J., Dryja, T. “Lightning Network Whitepaper,” Flashstarts (2015) https://lightning.flashstarts.com/lightning-network-whitepaper/.

Tikhomirov, S., Moreno-Sanchez, P., Maffei, M. “A Quantitative Analysis of Security, Anonymity and Scalability for the Lightning Network,” in IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW) 387-396 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSPW51379.2020.00059.

van Engelshoven, Y., Roos, S. “The Merchant: Avoiding Payment Channel Depletion Through Incentives,” 2021 IEEE International Conference on Decentralized Applications and Infrastructures (DAPPS) United Kingdom 59-68 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/DAPPS52256.2021.00012.

Wouters, S. “When Might the Bitcoin Network Process Volumes like Mastercard & Visa?” Blockdata (21 December 2021) https://www.blockdata.tech/blog/general/bitcoin-volume-mastercard-visa.

Zabka, P., Foerster, K. T., Schmid, S., Decker, C. “Empirical Evaluation of Nodes and Channels of the Lightning Network,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing 83 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2022.101584.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-12-06

How to Cite

Gotham, E. (2023). Irrational Economic Action: Running a Bitcoin Lightning Node for Negative Profit. Ledger, 8. https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2023.289

Issue

Vol. 8 (2023)

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Edward Gotham

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
  9. The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.